Recently, I addressed the
issues of privacy on LinkedIn with my article on Social Media Sun. In many ways
what Google is doing is what LinkedIn does on a grand scale. They are taking information
available online, such as what we search for, pages we visit, what we do with
Google+, and consolidating it to one place for easy reference.
On the other hand, the
webpages we view are not public information, the way our alma mater is, or past
employers, and that is what makes me uneasy. Some may argue that users are utilizing
a Google service, so Google has the right to store the information processed on
its server.
The entire issue seems to
come down to the question of the permanence of the internet, and all that is
done on it. The ‘Right to be Forgotten’ has continued to be a huge issue in the
European community as people hammer out what it means to be forgotten on the
internet, how that interacts with free speech, and how it can be implemented and
under what guidelines.
The legal issues surrounding
the internet are going to continue to be debated in the coming years, really
the coming decades. But what do you think about Google’s data collection and
the ‘Right to be Forgotten’? Who owns what is posted on the internet? How do we
regulate ownership and determine if someone can demand something being permanently
deleted?
No comments:
Post a Comment